Joomla! site syndication http://nationalword.com Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:40:41 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://nationalword.com/images/M_images/joomla_rss.png http://nationalword.com Joomla! site syndication http://nationalword.com/content/view/63/26/ The ONLY thing that's the same about the democrat party of `1964` and `2008` is the name. This is best illustrated in states with the most stable residents ( where people don't move out or in much) like Kentucky or West Virginia who up until the end of the Jimmy Carter presidency voted straight democrat most of the time but ever since Carter have voted Republican. You see, the ideology of people doesn't change as easy as a political parties do. The Democrat party in 1964 would be considered right wing Republican today. But, also in 1964 the socialism of the radical candidates, began resurrecting the economic slavery of the post Civil War African Americans and started over taking the party of our fathers and left us with a party far different. I have several friends in Kentucky and WV that believes the reason they vote Republican today is because the Republican party of today is like the JFK democrats they once loved. While the Democrat party of today seems completely taken over by the socialist who also, have made it half way through the Republican party. You see the core values of people don't change, but parties do. That's why the ones who are more emotional thinkers that refuse to analyze issues have blind loyalties to things like football teams, schools spirit, neighborhoods, etc are so easily taken along with sweeping changes that can leave a party with only a name that can be recognized. The most famous democrat who recognized this take over , Ronald Reagan who in 1962 said I didn't leave the Democrat Party. The party left me. I have some friends still refusing to analyze their party and will argue and disagree with the facts and I still love them. And That's the National Word !! Blog - Blog Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:37:11 +0100 http://nationalword.com/content/view/62/26/ Political beliefs and ones kindness sometimes are linked in that they coexist in the same thinking process that forms our personalities. If we consider that there are basically two main core sides to a thought process. One being “Emotional” and the other being “Analytical” and look at them objectively then we can figure out each others politics. THE EMOTIONAL PROCESS is the most natural . Even though everyone has an analytical side which is usually found in the sub conscientious of the young as they figure out basic movements like balance, pain and cause of it, speech, etc. Everyone starts life with an emotional thought process. This is illustrated in the child's innocents, love and dependence for their parents, jealousy, sharing, stinginess, laughter and as they get older anger, the blindness of teenage love, school spirit, the coolness of something or someone, fashion . Etc. They usually listen to more music than the analytical thinker and usually will only support rules they they feel are fair. Because of this ,their decisions are usually processed by emotional thought, or the way they feel about it first and then reevaluated with less weighted analytical thought. They usually judge things by the way they feel about it.. If they alter their feelings they can change their minds. Because their foundation are primarily formed from feelings if one can move them emotionally one can change who they are. They are more likely to lead a liberal life style. The females in our species, because of the effect of higher levels of estrogen in their system and the lower levels of testosterone, will usually tend to be weighted more as an emotional thinker, they will usually be more sensitive to their feelings, more forgiving, caring, loving, thoughtful etc. THE ANALYTICAL PROCESS requires data to analyze and because of this usually is found in the sub conscientious of the young as they figure out basic movements like balance, pain and cause of it, speech, etc. As a child grows and new data sources become available their analytical traits become more evident. They tend to want to debate issues, normally won't stray from the written rules, they may be one to save money , be less sensitive to others opinions, may be considered a “nerd” or “geek” . They tend to be get along with adults at a younger age. Less easy to sway. May read or watch, listen and read more informational programing and less music. May be more blunt and could be considered less fun than the emotional thinker. Because of this, their decisions are usually processed by analyzed data first and then reevaluated with lesser emotional thought. If they can't change the data they usually won't change their mind. Because their foundation is primarily formed from Analyzed data as long as the data doesn't change or the find error in the way it was analyzed they generally don't change easily and are more likely to lead a more conservative life style. The males in our species, because of the effect of higher levels of testosterone in their system and the lower levels of estrogen, will usually tend to be weighted more analytical and less sensitive, they will usually be more aggressive, competitive, and because of the less emotional slant will be more blunt and harder to change their mind. One of the most noticed effects of when the analytical and the emotional of a same age group collide is in the teenage ( lightning) years. When a girls uncontrolled emotionally weighted thought process is looking for someone to say they love them and the boys uncontrolled analytical weighted thought process that will notice, analyze and use this information to to manipulate the feelings and actions of a girl. Or, when a girl emotionally falls for another boys loving talk and hurts the first. Just the unbridled natural effects of exercising their natural hormonally driven thought process. This has always seem horribly wrong but every mother and farther, having gone through it, understands it and does what that can to protect their kids from it. Because of the hormonal imbalance ( lighting ) at this age the above may not always be so one sided. If we remember the how the core belief system works then we can apply it in all situations to help us understand people and how they think, react and interact, how the buy and deal with each other and society. These things should be considered when we are looking for someone to marry, to hire, or put in charge of a project, raise children, manage our money, or lead people. God did. POLITICIANS KNOW When we use this science to accomplish a political end it's called “Political Science” . This is best illustrated in the way politicians approach people and thats where you start to see the exploitation and divide between Emotional and Analytical thinkers. This is illustrated in the last election when : ONE candidates approach is to say. The bad rich people on wall street make more money than you and thats bad. They should be made to share it with the poor souls who didn't have a chance then they can buy the things the rich have. Now as you can see this is all meant to appeal to the emotions like, anger, envy, sharing, stingy, and maybe a shot of pain killer for a low self worth. The OTHER candidates approach is to say. If you take money away ( raise taxes ) from the people who have the money to spend on employee wages and machines to hire people and make things for us to eat and buy they be forced to choose to, or at least between providing a job for someone, or raising the price of what they sell the poor Now as you can see this is all meant to appeal to the those who will analyze their decisions first. If this, then that and if that, then those and if those, then oh crap we can't do this. As you can see both the Analytical thinkers and Emotional thinkers are for helping people. The Emotional thinker sees the flower and wants to pick it to give to someone. The Analytical thinker figures a way to grow flowers so his emotional friend has the opportunity to perform his deed. Maybe this is why more women and the younger crowd vote Liberal and more men and the mature crowd vote Conservative. Just one check. Now then, as we all know each one of us is a blend ( or Mutt ) of both Emotional and Analytical processors. Also, as we age women and mens testosterone/estrogen ratios shift. And, when you consider all the the other chemical and social blends in people ( and let us not forget Our Creators Special Gifts he gave us ) that makes us all individual, one must never say all this is 100% all the time but, Just Most. The main difference is which we allow to out weighs the other in our lives. AND NOW THE END The person I Love Most on earth is and Emotional and I'm and Analytical. My most loved is great at so many thing as I am at others. And Thats the National Word !! Blog - Blog Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:57:23 +0100 http://nationalword.com/content/view/61/26/ When in the coarse of human events a free Constitutional (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) Republic finds itself embedded with the very Constitutional (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) enemy that inspired its existence, the duty of all patriotic citizens is to expel and cleans the republic of this enemy and not support or extend the attack on the Republic's Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) by acceptance of it. ( See the Declaration of Independence - Our founding Document that teaches a free people on how to start, stop and handle a government ) Barack Hussein Obama “ son of an African, educated as a small child in Indonesia where he was registered in school as a Muslim, and brought up later in Hawaii by his 100 percent white, mainstream grandparents “(Arab News) , will within six month's after his inauguration, through signed legislation and executive orders remove our right of free speech, and free enterprise, both protected by the Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) . Fairness Doctrine. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsJbhpgmdHs feature=related) This will take away his oppositions ability to be heard while insuring his and his fellow socialist/marxist continued over throw of the United States as a free nation ,as defined by its founders. See Video below. The government then will decide what can and can't be heard. When an ideology, and those who follow it, expresses its disregard for the Constitution by considering it a historical document changeable by an appointed judges decree rather than the Constitutionally required ¾ ( 75% ) of the states legislatures in the union, then we must consider it an enemy of the constitution. The US Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) is the document that puts limitations on the governments control over the free people. This document defines the difference between the free people and government. The Declaration of Independence (our founding document) teaches a free people how to handle, stop and re-start a government. The Government and The People are two completely different considered entities and while these document spell this out in its protection of people from the government, it also prevent any one from changing it by placing a requirement of an two thirds vote by all the states in the union. This means an supreme court Justus can only make it judgments in accordance with it. Doing otherwise would require the self contained approval of the people ¾ ( 75% ) of the states legislatures in the union. One can't use one part of The Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) to destruct another part of it. Thats called enemy infiltration. All who follow the oath to protect it from all enemies both from without and from within must cleans this enemy from the very system that allows them to participate. Remember the Declaration of Independence and Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) teaches the will of the government is not the will of the people. The government does not speak for the people but the people speaks for the government from who its protected from. This may seam confusing to some but one must understand the founding fathers wisdom in why a government will always be a threat to the people who creates it.This is purely and precisely why they created the Constitution (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) (http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html) . In light of these facts I find it my Patriotic Duty to abide by the standards our founding fathers use while defining what an American is and oppose and fight this enemy till purged from union. And That's the American Word !! Read the rest of this article Blog - Blog Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:25:13 +0100 http://nationalword.com/content/view/60/26/ In History they'll realize the genius in the war strategy was to attract all the trained al Qaeda cells around the world at the beginning of their attack on our mainland by using the act of finishing an existing war in Iraq in a state of cease-fire ( being broken daily) to roundup in one place all the radical muslim terrorist in the world that hate America, and then kill as many of them as we could. Sure Saddam was guilty of genocide, sure there was mass-graves and yes finishing this long paused war was justified. Even Barrack Obama , as he stated in the last debate that preemptive war is justified in cases of genocide, would agree with it, at least on one of his many faces. Oh Yah: Remember the Weapons of Mass Distruction Program, the President also kept that find secret for security reasons while knowing he would look like he was wrong. Without self pride or a thirsty ego acted as Commander and Chief and was able to move 550 metric tons of uranium from Iraq to Canada in a secret mission. see: MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334) and confirmed by TRUTH or FICTION (http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm) . You see the appearance of the war to al Qaeda and their liberal allies here ( were you one? ) seemed senseless and ill-conceived. It didn't make sense to the ignorant and because the President was unable to explain the real reasons he took it on the chin and allowed him self to be ridiculed, mocked and demonized but not once did he give in to fashion and divulge secret war strategy or do what was popular. This fueled al Qaeda even more when they saw our people and politicians siding with them. This worked in his favor and drew even more to the the central front where they died. This strategy only worked because we have such a great man of character as President, who put our safety as a nation first above all and relied on God to keep him humble and his ego at check while keeping this strategy secret. You'll find that only a small group knew and kept this strategy secret. As you can see Colin Powell probably wasn't in that group which explains a lot. The generals charged with the operational functions of war didn't need to know the overlying strategy but only the battle strategy. Most people naturally assume the goal in war is to get your enemy to surrender and make peace, you know, find a way to make peace. But, that was the farthest thing from the Presidents mind. You see he knew this al Qaeda's hatred was based in their religion and he knew because of his own deep religious convictions there is nothing man can do to change that. We would have to eliminate them. God illustrates this to us in His Word as Joshua was commanded to do the same and for the same reason. Yes George W. Bush is hated. Hated for not caring what people think which always burns the socialist who's main goal is to control people, he is also hated by the enemy who's butt he kicked. But most of all he is hated for being a Christian and actually using God's Word in his decision making. Can you imagine that ? Using Gods Word to make decisions ? Sure, after killing them off we are now able to reconcile those who don't follow this radical belief. I doubt George W. Bush is interested in a simple legacy which requires ego and pride. He is humbly relying on History where only greatness can place one and with hope that future citizens will still be taught. It's amazing the greatness when one , through the Grace of God one is able to dump the pride and ego. Remember, one can tell how great of a President he is buy how hated he is by the socialist democrats. The only question is, which side have you ended up on ? You need to take a few minutes in front of a mirror and really give this some thought. They say hindsight is 20-20 but that's only true if your not Blind. And That's the National Word ! ! Bonus Video Blog - Blog Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:54:01 +0100 http://nationalword.com/content/view/59/26/ Martin Luther King Jr defines racism as one who judges another by the color of their skin I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. . To be for or against someone while basing any part of that decision on ones skin shade is racism in it's purist form. I don't judge others by their skin shades but it appears that 80% of the black community who are voting for Obama because of his skin shade ( as proven in primary against Clinton where 80% voted for Obama ) are defined racist by Martin Luther King, Jr. SHAME ON THEM. Seems this election is exposing everyone's true color. We live in a nation where all have the freedom to achieve or fail according to the content of their character, effort and determination. We also have the freedom and the right to fail. Since 90% of those who succeed in business can contribute their success to previous failures that taught and perfected their methods of success we must hold value to the basic right to fail and not hold judgment on those going through this process but have admiration for their fortitude. Their is no greater disrespect than to feel sorry for someone. It's time we Americans start showing each other the basic respect of being equal, no matter what the skin shade or how much stuff we have, but for who we are. Racism is bad no matter what your skin shade. And That's the National Word !! Blog - Blog Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:23:38 +0100